To further my desire to both acknowledge and dispute Eliza Daley’s recent essay on ruralization (mentioned in a previous post), I want to wrap up my thoughts about the unsustainability of our society and economy. If you keep reading you will see me argue repeatedly that giant cities should be avoided, or possibly departed if you already live there, in favor of smaller cities. Partly this is because their citizens are often gerrymandered out of political influence, but partly it is because I think big cities are inherently problematic. Here I’m skipping ahead a bit to explain why I think so.

 

 

Read more... )

 

In the last post I talked about the fact that the ecological collapse of the Southwest is already starting. That process is now irreversible, given the long-term drought that is the predicted result of climate change. At most, a wet year here and there will put off catastrophe for a few years; it will not reverse the trend that must, probably sooner than we think, lead to the virtual abandonment of overgrown desert cities such as Las Vegas. The climate-related problems other threatened regions of the U.S. face are not quite so imminent, but because they are grave, Americans would be wise to avoid moving to those regions, and to consider moving out if they are already there.

 

 

Read more... )

 

As we will see, the entire world is facing problems due to the collision of skyrocketing population and consumption with falling global resources and increasing pollution costs. Many parts of the U.S. will suffer directly from climate change, but even the lucky places that see relatively little climate disruption will find their economic arrangements more and more affected by what is happening to everyone else. Thus, there are no really safe zones.

However, there are definitely less safe zones. My view of these is informed by three major sources: The U.S. Global Change Research Program’s (2018) Climate Report, John W. Day and Charles Hall’s (2016) analysis of regional economic dependencies and climate effects on water and sea level in America’s Most Sustainable Cities and Regions, and Julie Kurtz and colleagues’ (2020) present-day foodshed mapping, which analyzed how possible it was for America’s urban centers to be fed by the farmland of the surrounding region. These sources generally point in the same directions. While the latter two suggest that any large, densely populated urban areas are questionably sustainable, three regions are particularly problematic due to the severity of the problems they will face and the huge numbers of people involved. These are the Southwest, southern Florida, and the highly urbanized eastern coasts. Unfortunately, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau (2021), all of these regions are continuing to grow in population. All of them are sure to see serious disruptions, but the Southwest is going to be first. In fact, it has passed its tipping point into crisis and the disasters are already beginning.

 

 

Read more... )

 

Welcome to my new blog! Perhaps its title has made you wonder what it’s about. Its purpose is to acknowledge that some parts of the United States are rapidly approaching systemic collapse, and to encourage residents of those areas to move while they can do so in relative safety; indeed, to start a campaign to inspire people to do so in large numbers. I will discuss why you should consider this action in the very near term, suggest a varied selection of potential destinations—with both reader feedback and additional suggestions very welcome—and give some advice on how to do it successfully. There’s a lot to get out here, so I’ll do my best to post frequently.

 

Read more... )

 

Profile

next_migration

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1 234567
8910111213 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 13th, 2025 05:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios