Planning the Next Great Migration

As we will see, the entire world is facing problems due to the collision of skyrocketing population and consumption with falling global resources and increasing pollution costs. Many parts of the U.S. will suffer directly from climate change, but even the lucky places that see relatively little climate disruption will find their economic arrangements more and more affected by what is happening to everyone else. Thus, there are no really safe zones.

However, there are definitely less safe zones. My view of these is informed by three major sources: The U.S. Global Change Research Program’s (2018) Climate Report, John W. Day and Charles Hall’s (2016) analysis of regional economic dependencies and climate effects on water and sea level in America’s Most Sustainable Cities and Regions, and Julie Kurtz and colleagues’ (2020) present-day foodshed mapping, which analyzed how possible it was for America’s urban centers to be fed by the farmland of the surrounding region. These sources generally point in the same directions. While the latter two suggest that any large, densely populated urban areas are questionably sustainable, three regions are particularly problematic due to the severity of the problems they will face and the huge numbers of people involved. These are the Southwest, southern Florida, and the highly urbanized eastern coasts. Unfortunately, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau (2021), all of these regions are continuing to grow in population. All of them are sure to see serious disruptions, but the Southwest is going to be first. In fact, it has passed its tipping point into crisis and the disasters are already beginning.