The following text backtracks to present almost all of the last bit of my chapter on selecting a new region to live. It offers answers to a few questions that could be asked in response to my suggestion that migrants should select their destinations with an eye to the possible geographic outlines and politics of successor nations following the collapse of the United States. If you are confident that the scenario of breakup within your lifetime is ridiculous, then you may wish to ignore this topic.

However, the country is so severely divided that one of the few alternatives to a civil war leading to breakup or total loss of democracy could be the development of an extreme form of federalism, in which states are free to have secular or theocratic government, democracy or the mere pretense of it. In that scenario, while the disparate regions would continue to enjoy the wealth and power that come with being part of the U.S. imperial homeland, the legal regimes, education, social safety nets, civil rights and liberties, and so forth that their citizens would experience would be so different that they might as well be different countries. The one major difference is that people would be much freer to vote with their feet—unless their state’s laws forbade them to exit.

Therefore, three controversial questions:

 

Read more... )

 

I want to return now to the topic of American political collapse, which I began earlier and quit in order to make a few digressions. Recall that civil war expert Barbara Walter calls attention to the perils of factionalization, especially when politics is based on the interests of “superfactions” that share multiple group identities, such as geography, race, and religion, and especially when a faction that has held disproportionate power feels itself losing it. That all sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

Our politics, our social lives and even our science are increasingly eaten up by Red vs. Blue Faction battles. Many of us have not fit happily into either of the major-party factions and, if we do not feel personally threatened by one, wander back and forth according to which issue exercises us at the moment. Do you want low taxes or equal rights for women? Liberal gun laws or a functioning environment? They aren’t obviously mutually exclusive, but nobody’s offering both, so pick one!

I will make my position explicit: although I don’t love the Democratic Party, the text posted below is written from the position of a Blue Faction supporter, because the single issue I now consider paramount is whether we will continue to have free elections. (Free and fair would be nice, but our elections for many offices are now semi-fair at best.) I would vote for promoters of an easily accessible universal franchise who were anti-choice and pro-coal over pro-environment, pro-choice people who wanted to not just stop as many opponents as possible from voting, but arrogate to themselves (only) the right to simply discard the results of elections that didn’t come out their way. Unfortunately, that latter is increasingly the Republican Party’s official position. I have nothing against the majority of ordinary Red voters, for whom I will later have plenty of red-state destinations to suggest (I want them to be safe and happy too!), but I regard the Red factional leaders and their extremist followers as a profound danger to our country and many of its residents. If that will offend you, you may wish to skip reading this article.

 

Read more... )

 

Profile

next_migration

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1 234567
8910111213 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 08:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios